Why the Ancient Giants Coverup? Explained!!!

 

In all my decades of studying clues about the ancient giants, it took me stepping back to see the global picture to realize why governments, religions, and educational institutions (the controlliing trinity) would want to bury (literally and figuratively) the ancient giants and their implications. I will present my conclusions here -

MEGALITHIC CULTURE

Mega: Very large, 

as in "megafauna" and "megaflora"

I'll start with the structures worldwide and work my way out into the bigger picture of the setting in which this occurred.

Casa Grande Ruins, Arizona

The Casa Grande ruins are said to be an old observatory by a now missing tribe referred to as the "HoHoKam." The narrative for the educational set and the public at large is that this tribe also carved hundreds of miles of wide and deep canals across the south central part of Arizona. 

A great deal was attributed to this tribe (from the "classic" period around 1100 CE through 1400s CE). For a tribe that lived in observed shacks of poor construction and didn't mine, the concept of them doing all these grandiose things of miles of canals and an observatory (Casa Grande interestingly also had pyramids attributed to it) is rather crazy. 

If you put a modern day person in a 200-year-old home, you don't assume the guy who doesn't know a hammer from a chisel built it. 

We know the Aztecs moved into the complex of Teotihuacan in Mexico in the beginning of the 13th century, but the occupants who built this incredible complex were long gone, a thousand years or more. For the Aztecs, it seemed like a place built by the gods and so it became a complex for their faith, but that was not its original intended purpose. Researchers decided to call that culture the Toltecs, but that is once again a part of a narrative I will continue discussing here.

There are subtle signs that make you go "huh?" that archaeologists forgot to hide - 

Sometimes, as a researcher, it feels like I am coming out of a long-held human amnesia. I noticed this very strange similarity between the statues of Easter Island and the Tula statues of Teotihuacan - the circle and the belt. 

above - Teotihuacan and Easter Island.

There is something odd going on here, eh? 

One of the greatest falacies of archaeology is that "man didn't circumnavigate the world back then, they were too crude for such boats." 

But - let's go back to the HoHoKam, a tribe with primitive tools and no construction know how - yet these same scholars say those people built an observatory, pyramids, and a massive canal system. 

Do you see the discrepancies? 

Here's an example from my own research - 

We can agree that a location like the Marquesas Islands in the South Pacific had some wonderful statues carved back around the 11th Century (same time period the HoHoKam supposedly was building canals and such).

Marquesas Islands statues 

Now, in modern day New Mexico, a very experienced researcher came across a cave entrance that was completely engulfed in scrub bushes and trees that grew over the decades. When inside, he got a photo of a cave that not only looked obviously carved out with a stacked stone dias and a wall carving of a hand, but stone statues stood atop the dias - her's the photo and enlargements. 

This cave is over 4000 miles from the Marquesas Islands. We attribute the Polynesian folk with navigating into and settling into the islands of the South Pacific around the 10th Century. 

My question is if these statues were done by the Polynesian folk or if they were already there from an established culture, like the Olmecs (oldest American tribe as of yet identified, but whose origins do not look like the Amerindians of the Americas) who appeared Polynesian. 

Olmec

I am reminded of the Canary Islands where a strange Guanche people acted as if they were stranded there, didn't even build boats, had blue eyes and blond and red hair, when the Spanish arrived and took over. 

Is this a case like the HoHoKam and the Aztecs that the Pacific Islands were settled in places that had already been established and abandoned? 

Look at the brain twist archaeologists have to go through to explain Easter island when even the Rapa Nui spoke of the long-earred ones that were the prior people who carved the statues. 

We still have no legitimate explanation from archaeologists about the construction of these megalithic sites all around the world. It's as if there was a civilization here, as big and dynamic as our own that somehow went missing all together. 

Remember this scene (above) from "Planet of the Apes"? The apes were well esablished and living among the rubble of a prior culture and this statue with a human face was a thing of shame in an area the people were forbidden to attend.

Are you seeing the bigger picture? 

Let's move on to something smaller than the structures and the canals, mining, and technology of this prior culture we sit atop of. Let's look at the people who inhabited that world who were also of a mega quality - the ancient giants!

Around the world, thousands of ancient giant skeletons have been unearthed. Some of these managed to make it into newspaper accounts. They are from the same time period as these megalithic structures, but the misleading trinity (government, religion, education_ want you to look away from that. Surely, those are sensational accounts to get readers, skeletons that were misjudged in size, or poor souls with acromegaly.

Did you ever ask your parent something about the nature of the universe and they think a little longer than usual, look a bit uncomfortable, and give you a pat answer that doesn't really answer the question? 

You know, like "hey dad, how do clouds hold heavy rain and not fall down?"  

Pause - 

"Well son, the clouds are machines that make rain and send it down as soon as its formed, so they don't really, ahem, carry the rain, they just spit it out." 

This is how the trinity keeps us from knowing truth by giving us ambiguous answers we're too ignorant (in their eyes) to notice.

So, what is the conclusion I'm coming to? 

The government of the United States, that put in the Bureau of Ethnicity to study the native people and then the Smithsonian to handle the findings, that later on decided to make a law that any antiquities are to be handed over to the native people (to hide them from prying eyes), had an agenda to hide knowledge. The Churches have had a motive to hide the knowledge. The educational system was the grant-paid-for group of nerds to provide public answers that fit the narrative handed to them. 

What was that narrative? 

That, the Earth had a prior culture(s) that were advanced technologically, that spread out over the earth and established themselves in a mega culture of size - people and buildings. This is a lot like the dinosaur eras of gigantic creatures and plants. 

What happened to the dinosaurs, megafauna, and megaflora? Gone!

And what did the Bible and Gilgamesh, Hopi, and other native cultures and religions repeatedly speak of - a flood that obliterated the culture.

We talk a lot these days about what we would do with UFO disclosure and if humanity can handle it or it would be total chaos, but imagine telling humanity that repeatedly culture reached their pinnacle and were obliterated? 

Do you think they'd go to work tomorrow? Stop stealing and killing? 

How do you keep citizens in line (government's concern), keep the faithful tithing their churches (religion's concern), and who is set with the task of keeping us oblivious (education/scholars -  tasked with storytelling society's necessary conclusions uch like the orangutans in "Planet of the Apes").

I've heard lots of explanations for why the giants were covered up and I've explored them all, but the truth repeatedly appears to be that folks like the Egyptians, the Aztecs, the Polynesians, the Americans are all living atop of the remains of a prior obliterated culture. And this is a cycle for our planet over and over again and a reality that, if it enters the consciousness of the present people, would halt progress and advancement because, well, why bother?

If there's anything we know about our present culture of humans is that we believe we are the be all and end all of intelloigence. We are the chosen ones, the freak of nature that advanced above other creatures in this solar system, and perhaps even beyond. 

And, if you want some real chillbumps, consider this - 

We talk a lot about the possibility that these alien greys that show up in our world are perhaps our descendants from the far future. 

This may seem crazy, but look at the giants of the past living in a world of giant things and look at us, smaller people in a world of smaller things, but even more technologically advanced than the giants. So, imagine as time goes on, what would we become? Something smaller, weaker (as technology does the hard work), and perhaps if there is more gravity, a darker atmosphere, frail bodies, pale skin, big eyes, and small stature...

Are greys the next brilliant culture upon the earth? Could their interest in what we are doing and our DNA a fascination only an even further advanced culture would seek out if they could circumvent time travel by even more advanced means? 

So, technically, if the government, religions, and educational systems don't want us to know about the prior culture that went missing, wouldn't they also want (for the same reasons) for mankind to not be aware that we will pass this way and the aliens are the future culture?

Two of the greatest coverups by the controlling trinity, explained.

BTW, next time you're at a museum or open up a school book, stay properly questioning of "absolutes" about anything. Some of it is what we know at the present time (in the future we'll know more) and a great part of it is what we are allowed to know.

If you want to know more about the giants, I highly suggest you pursue the work of Jim Vieira. I consider him to be a most objective and well-researched source, not owned by any educational system and entirely independent. These are the researchers we must seek.